Tag: Hypocrisy

Chapel Hill Shooting…

Chapel Hill Shooting…

By |

By now you’ve heard about the three Muslims who were shot and killed in Chapel Hill N.C. In case you haven’t:

Three Muslims Killed in Chapel Hill N.C  (*By White-NRA-Tea Party-Ted Cruz-Republican-Racist etc of course*)

That in parenthesis comment is where this post is headed and it was added by me. Fact is, this was a dispute between tenants at a complex. The shooter was an Atheist, an extremely Anti-ANY RELIGION. That alone should be enough to show he was anything but a “Right Side of the Aisle” extremist.

Which party boo’d GOD at their national convention? I’ll wait.
Which party uses the SPLC, ACLU and other lawyer groups against religious institutions?(Christians/Catholics/Jews)

However, there’s a problem with only seeing the obvious. It misses the target too. The Tea Party has been infiltrated with capitol L libertarians, these folks in large part are maximum freedom lovers, but tend to side with the “Remove cross from hills” “Remove the Ten Commandments” “Don’t allow prayer in public” folks… They also side with the gay marriage crowd..

My take on the Three Muslims killed in Chapel Hill is simple:

The guy that killed them should be punished to the full extent that the law allows. If these “Muslims” were the “Moderate” Muslims America has been searching for, there’s three less of them now.

The hypocrisy is astounding though, 3 muslims gunned down and college students rail as if they have been validated about their victimization of poor muslims, yet totally silent about the Jews gunned down in France, The Christians killed by Muslims, the onslaught of Muslim atrocities that have been happening for the past three generations. (Not going as far back as the crusades)

So, beware all you “Kill all Muslims” folks, when any muslim is killed in America its a hate crime, when a muslim kills you, its workplace violence or an unknown ideology driving force… LOL

Two and Half Men Dust up..Again

Two and Half Men Dust up..Again

By |

I don’t usually weigh in on entertainment news but this has me a bit pissed off and kind of confused. On one hand, I admire the kids courage to stand up. On the other I find it very selfish and hypocritical.

Star of ‘Two and a Half Men’ Angus T. Jones urges fans to stop watching, calls show ‘filth’

Move over Charlie Sheen, another “Two and a Half Men” controversy is exploding.
Angus T. Jones, who has played the role of Jake Harper, “the half” on the hit CBS show since 2003, is featured in a new video for the Forerunner Christian Church, in which he calls the sitcom “filth” that contradicts his devout Christian values.

So to get this straight. The kid who gets about 350k a WEEK for starring in a sitcom is now finding it “Filthy?” I understand the religious aspect and the confliction it brings. But if you want to be “Courageous” how about quitting first? How about giving the producers/writers a chance to see about working around it? That would be the right way to do it. What this kid did is deliberately sabotage a very long running series who employ a lot of people. Not right under any circumstances.

Personally, I think this type of thing hurts Christians more than it helps. While the evangelicals will call him brave and call him a hero, most church going God Fearing people in America are seeing this as unnecessary, pitiful and selfish.

I liked that show back when Charlie Sheen was on it. Back int he first 3 or 4 seasons after that I kind of got bored.

Some of the best things about Two and Half men was the actresses..

Tricia Helfer

Jodi Lyn O’Keefe

…

Read More Read More

James Carville is the lead Hypocrite of the Democrats?

James Carville is the lead Hypocrite of the Democrats?

By |

Flashback: Carville Wanted Bush to Fail

The press never reported that Democratic strategist James Carville said he wanted President Bush to fail before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But a feeding frenzy ensued when radio host Rush Limbaugh recently said he wanted President Obama to fail.

On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, just minutes before learning of the terrorist attacks on America, Democratic strategist James Carville was hoping for President Bush to fail, telling a group of Washington reporters: “I certainly hope he doesn’t succeed.”

Carville was joined by Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg, who seemed encouraged by a survey he had just completed that revealed public misgivings about the newly minted president.

“We rush into these focus groups with these doubts that people have about him, and I’m wanting them to turn against him,” Greenberg admitted.

The pollster added with a chuckle of disbelief: “They don’t want him to fail. I mean, they think it matters if the president of the United States fails.”

Minutes later, as news of the terrorist attacks reached the hotel conference room where the Democrats were having breakfast with the reporters, Carville announced: “Disregard everything we just said! This changes everything!”

Well well, what have we here? The truth making an appearance after 8 years! My goodness the media CAN keep a secret if it involves LIBTARD Douchebags.

I’d love to be locked in a room with skeletor, I’d clean out his colon with a chair leg unfortunately he’d probably like it.

More fun with the unhinged, Bristol Palin Drinking.

More fun with the unhinged, Bristol Palin Drinking.

By |

The libtards are in full on attack mode, they have got pictures of Sara’s kid partying and what not. Don’t know when the pictures were taken but the poor girl has got to be living a nightmare. WHY?


Don't see her drinking though.. LOL
Don't see her drinking though, maybe just a bottle? :rollingeyes:

Exactly what does that have to do with Sara Palin’s ability or qualifications?

If you suggest that because her daughter is a TYPICAL teenager, who might experiment with sex and alcohol before she comes of age. YEP the kid grew up in Alaska, so it would be a MIRACLE if the kid didn’t do drugs,smoke, drink and have sex. Mom has given all the same info to her kids that I am sure most parents give theirs. How many of our kids listened? Yep not many.

And if you suggest that because mom is running for office so her family is fair game, fine.

I wish Sarah Palin could control her children better, I really think this is a bad thing for Sara Palin and her family to go through. I am glad they are keeping the baby, and I am sure this will haunt Bristol Palin for a long time. I also hope others learn from these mistakes and try not to duplicate them.

I submit that Bristol Palin will be far better off with her mom and dad than MOST kids going through the same thing. Obama and Michelle sitting in the waiting room at the abortion clinic with their kid would be a great photo op.

Ok I have addressed the Bristol Palin issue, I have admitted that Sarah Palin lost control of her oldest kid and that is a shame, had the kid listened to her mom, she might not be in this position. So do you feel better? I mean really or will it take you finding porn pictures of a kid to make your little minds feel better about bashing a conservative mom?

I submit you liberal twerps have NOTHING to work with, you have no substance to list accomplishments, you have only “Look what she did” and “Look at them” while not having ANYTHING to put out that your guys have done… Too bad. Not going to work NOW didn’t work then.

So now lets discuss the issues with Ayers, Rev Wright, and the lack of experience Obama has? we have been trying to get a believable answer on those questions for over 6 months, and we hear crickets chirping? How about accomplishments in the senate? did your guy ever vote for anything NOT Democrat? did he ever do anything other than wait till his aides got back to him?

We have a manchurian candidate in Obama, he was groomed for this, it is obvious by his lack of votes on Key issues. It is obvious by his “Rockstar” image. He is going for the “Youth” as is written in a very good book.

anything?

Yeah that’s what I thought.  Score another one to Sarah Palin..

Racist hypocrite at American Power

Racist hypocrite at American Power

By |

I was alerted to this post at American Power (No link ever) and the name is really misleading, since the owner of that particular blog is more American Whiner than Power.
The blog owner of American Power has decided that his opinion of racism is the only opinion that counts. He has determined that everyone in the blogsphere that believes in protecting our nation by whatever means necessary is a Racist, Donnie has become the self appointed moral policeman of the blogs, he is trying to silence those of differing opinions by using race, he is Barak Hussien Obama’s wet dream. This is my response to your “Article” and again I will not comment or link your 2 cent blog here EVER.

Sunday, August 3, 2008
The Hatred of the Online Crowd

Popular culture has been transformed by new modes of online communications and social networking platforms. From Blogger to MySpace to YouTube, technology provides endless opportunities for people to make friends, share hopes and joys, and perhaps live dangerously.

Today the Internet is much more than esoteric discussion forums. It is a mass medium for defining who we are to ourselves and to others. Teenagers groom their MySpace profiles as intensely as their hair; escapists clock 50-hour weeks in virtual worlds, accumulating gold for their online avatars. Anyone seeking work or love can expect to be Googled. As our emotional investment in the Internet has grown, the stakes for trolling — for provoking strangers online — have risen. Trolling has evolved from ironic solo skit to vicious group hunt.

Don Quotes a NY TIMES article here… I don’t do much quoting of NY times on my blog because that would be very HYPOCRITICAL of me, since I have spent the majority of my bloglife calling the NY times a biased, leftwing liberal rag…Quoting it when it suits me would be wrong don’t you think?

What caught my attention about this story is not the notion of “trolling” but the larger issue of the “hatred of the online crowd,” referred as “malwebolence.”

Much of online communication is pseudonymous, and thus in the absence of fear of consequences we see the proliferation of the most horrendously depraved behavior from what is, essentially, a tech-savvy, un-lumpen web-prowl-etariat.

I really love that part “in the absence of fear of consequences ” I hear him calling all kinds of folks racists, he calls me, Gawfer, Jenn and the readers of our blogs and the entire blog roll of Reject the UN “Racists”, yet he can’t cite ANY time that either of us made a racist remark. We have made opinions, we have fought for free speech, we have made posts that can be called race oriented by race baiters like Donnie but the vast majority of people see them as “Thought provoking” or at least an “Opinion based on experience.”

Personally I would say EVERYTHING I have ever said in a blog or comment section to ANYONES face. Donnie if you called me a racist to my face I would kick your ass… Believe it. There would be a consequence for that action, I would also be more than happy to tell you to your face I AM PROUD TO BE A WHITE MAN IN AMERICA. To your face, in front of your family and in the middle of soul train, It wouldn’t be a problem for me.. I will never say in any way shape or form that I am disgusted by my race, or that I am ashamed to be white because of what my forefathers did because I believe I had nothing to do with it therefore I can not be held accountable for it.

We know the dangers: tragedies like Megan Meier’s MySpace suicide, the mysogynistic death threats to tech-writer Kathy Sierra, or the demonization of conservatives bloggers like Jeff Goldstein.

The intensity of the hatred itself is not new. What’s novel is the unprecedented volume and retrievability, which is accelerated by the liberation of unaccountability.

I haven’t been the subject of a social networking demonization campaign, although last week I was introduced to the term “cobag” by those friendly nihilists at Sadly No! (and I get “fair and balanced” malwebolence from extreme right-wing hate bloggers as well, who allege I’m RINO for speaking out against racist blog rings (as seen, for example, here, here, here, and here).

My wife sometimes worries about my safety, as I don’t blog pseudonymously.

Yeah? Really Donnie? I think she is right to worry, you are one of the most annoying pieces of shit I have come across since I started blogging, not because you debate, not because you are of a different mindset, it is because you have piss poor reading comprehension skills, you don’t understand that what you are doing is so hypocritical and it borders on liberal views. It is the exact type of liberal thought you so vigorously fight against that is at issue. You feel that a “racist” insulted you, and rather than dealing with the individual you went after everyone else, and you have made yourself a laughing stock of the blogsphere… The test you failed is the test of hypocrisy, the absolute worst test a person can fail. You not only failed you brought all 3 of your readers with you… sad really.

Much of this hatred is defended in terms of the First Amendment, and the legal protections against online demonization aren’t so robust, as the Times indicates:

Citing the times is particularly funny to me.

Does free speech tend to move toward the truth or away from it? When does it evolve into a better collective understanding? When does it collapse into the Babel of trolling, the pointless and eristic game of talking the other guy into crying “uncle”? Is the effort to control what’s said always a form of censorship, or might certain rules be compatible with our notions of free speech…?

Controlling free speech???? Uh Hypocrite much there Donnie?

Why inflict anguish on a helpless stranger? It’s tempting to blame technology, which increases the range of our communications while dehumanizing the recipients … like … Megan Meier presumably wouldn’t happen if the perpetrators had to deliver their messages in person. But while technology reduces the social barriers that keep us from bedeviling strangers, it does not explain the initial trolling impulse. This seems to spring from something ugly — a destructive human urge that many feel but few act upon, the ambient misanthropy that’s a frequent ingredient of art, politics and, most of all, jokes. There’s a lot of hate out there, and a lot to hate as well….

There is a lot to hate out there Donnie, and the reason solutions are not found is because of folks like you, YOU label folks Racist in hopes of stirring folks away from issues, you call EVERYONE racist because you are black, I see no color on the web, you do when it suits you, matter of fact you might have a little bit of Al Sharpton Tendencies. Stay with it asshole it might work for you with some. NOT ME though.

Many trolling practices … violate existing laws against harassment and threats. The difficulty is tracking down the perpetrators. In order to prosecute, investigators must subpoena sites and Internet service providers to learn the original author’s IP address, and from there, his legal identity. Local police departments generally don’t have the means to follow this digital trail, and federal investigators have their hands full with spam, terrorism, fraud and child pornography. But even if we had the resources to aggressively prosecute trolls, would we want to? Are we ready for an Internet where law enforcement keeps watch over every vituperative blog and backbiting comments section, ready to spring at the first hint of violence? Probably not. All vigorous debates shade into trolling at the perimeter; it is next to impossible to excise the trolling without snuffing out the debate.

No one has to track me down Donnie I have nothing to hide, I am happy to give my name number and address to any FBI/ LE agent you care to point to me, I have a few friends that are involved in that aspect of life and it would be very interesting how your libelous slander is treated. Just because YOUR feelings are hurt does not mean I am a racist..

That’s probably as good a description of the issues as we’re going to get (although I’d be interested to read some legal and scholarly articles on this).

Read the entire New York Times article here: “The Trolls Among Us.” I guess the times is his best source when they agree with his views.

Posted by Donald Douglas at 7:58 AM

Donnie loves to link my WHITE in AMERICA post, I guess he thinks that was a racist post, It was simply an answer to the BLACK America TV SHOW that got national coverage I had our neighbors read that, oh they happen to be black, I asked if they were offended, I got an answer “For what?”

So opinions vary and YOURS Donny are no better than anyone else.

I have done some things in my life that I am not proud of, I have paid my price and I have overcome more obstacles than anyone in this medium will ever know. I have also done a lot of good in the past 20 years. I will list a few for you Donnie.
Feeding the homeless (Every month), Sheltering Iraq war VET’S (3 of them have lived with me over the past year for some period of time), Providing food, water and aid to hurricane Katrina victims in NOLA (3 weeks after the storm), Traveling to DC for the Gathering of Eagles 1 (to protect the Vietnam Memorial from liberal assholes)….Oh and currently twice a month we deliver clothes to some shelters in our area when donations come in…. Oh and Donnie, I’ll have you know a lot of the aid, help, supplies and work I did was for Americans.
I really never noticed what color they are, maybe I need to go back and look at the pictures again…

Donny, are you listening? Do you do anything but whine like a little bitch when you don’t get your way? Are you the type of man that sits down writes, complains and points the finger at everyone but himself? Surely you wouldn’t be that lame right?

I don’t give a damn about you or your blog, I couldnt give a shit less about YOU, but I am not linking to all the “RINO” writing you do as an example of liberal thinking, nor am I linking to your readers.. You are a HYPOCRITE DON, the worst kind.

Donnie sees race in everything, the only color I see is YELLOW and its color of the stripe running down ol Donnies back.

11% fewer INVADERS noted.

11% fewer INVADERS noted.

By |

Study finds 11% drop in illegal immigrants
Conservatives hail the report as proof Bush’s controversial policy of enforcement via workplace raids is working.

WASHINGTON — A report Wednesday indicating a marked decline in the number of illegal immigrants in the U.S. fueled a widening national debate over the Bush administration’s policy of immigration enforcement through aggressive workplace raids.

The largest such enforcement action was in May in Postville, Iowa, where federal immigration agents descended on a meatpacking plant and arrested nearly 400 workers later detained in a building used to house cattle.

The administration began aggressively enforcing workplace laws after Congress last year failed to pass an immigration overhaul. In the months since, thousands of workers have been arrested in scores of raids.

Conservatives have applauded the tactics, while critics have pointed to mistaken arrests of U.S. citizens, deaths of immigrants in detention and limited scrutiny of managers who recruit and hire them.

However, evidence that the strategy may have succeeded in reducing the number of illegal immigrants was presented in a report Wednesday by a group favoring tighter curbs on all forms of immigration.
The report by the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington-based think tank, says that the number of illegal immigrants fell about 11% between last August and May, from 12.5 million to 11.2 million.

The study was based on an analysis of census data and concludes that if that rate of decline is sustained, the number of illegal immigrants will be halved in five years.

Steve A. Camarota, the center’s research director, acknowledged that the economy played a role in the decline but said that several factors pointed to enforcement as key. For instance, the legal immigrant population continues to grow, while the fall-off in illegal immigrants began even before unemployment began rising.

“It seems that increased enforcement has played a significant role,” Camarota said.

Who would have thought actually enforcing the laws of the land would lead to a reduction in the crime the laws were designed to prevent? Not me heavens no, LMAO.

How about this, a two pronged attack.. Build the damned fence, shut down the ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION FLOOD all together and then discuss how to deal with the 12 to 30 million Illegals already here. UNTIL THE BORDER IS SEALED No Discussion at all.

BUSH IS a moron of galactic proportions him and his cronies have made a bundle off the illegal debacle, and they try to play it off like it’s a “Humane” issue.. NOT BUYING IT!

Mark my words, if BUSH doesn’t release Ramos and Campeon SOON, McCain will not win the white house. US Real CONSERVATIVES have a problem with hypocrisy.

With Obama we know were getting a racist/communist with appeasement tendencies, With McCain we think we are getting a “Republican” we are actually getting a knife in the back.

Mallard f

Racist White folks Sheeesh.

Racist White folks Sheeesh.

By |

Woman With Ties to White Supremacists Represents School for Blacks and Hispanics

A Florida woman who has been married to both the former head of the Ku Klux Klan and the creator of a notorious white supremacist Web site is working as a spokeswoman for a school that aims to lift underprivileged black and Hispanic children out of poverty.

An executive with an organization that tracks hate groups calls the employment of the woman, Chloe Black, an “untenable position” and “unbelievable.”

Black, the ex-wife of former KKK leader David Duke, is now married to Don Black, the creator of the white-power hate site Stormfront. Chloe Black is currently employed as an executive assistant at Florida Crystals, a sugar conglomerate whose owners, the Fanjul brothers, have donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to help build a new campus for Glades Academy.

Glades is a charter school for the children of African-American and migrant workers in Pahokee, a rural town in Palm Beach County. Billionaire Jose “Pepe” Fanjul’s wife, Emilia, is chairman of the board of Glades Academy, and she hired Black to help promote the school.

Reports suggest that Black’s salary from the school may be going to support her husband’s activities on the hate site, as Don Black has had no clear source of income for some time.

Now this is odd, she’s a racist, she was married to David Duke, she is currently married to Donnie Douglass’s 3rd favorite site owner Stormfront, BUT; she is involved in helping MINORITIES? She is promoting the school? is she doing a good job? These are questions that need to be asked

I guess it is possible to be a racist, and help underprivileged minorities that really arent minorities anymore…..I am so confused. I need an appointment with Dr Phil.

There are a couple of ways to look at this.

1. She is helping the underprivileged and if she is doing a good job, what she does with her own time is irrelevant.

2. She is being paid by a non-profit, she is literally in bed with absolute racists and they make money for being racists and HER money goes into that part of the family business.

Basically all this is the normal shit we will hear from now until the “First Black President” is elected. Oh, and if he isn’t elected it will be because America is full of racists.

Funny how when it’s a BLACK Presidential candidate it doesn’t matter who he hangs around with, Reverend Wright, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farakhan or WHO he is married to,… But if you are are white YOU ARE RACIST! END OF STORY! If it wasn’t so true it would be hilarious.

Racism is now the issue, if you DON’T vote for Obama or subscribe to his racist ideology, YOU are a racist. Get prepared and ready your defenses because the Donnie Dickheads of the world will cry racist at every turn to get your mind off the issues.
The biggest 3 issues for me are still the ECONOMY, ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and the WAR ON TERROR. I’m leaving the race issue for the true racist, the one that sees racism in everything, Donny Dickhead, have at it.