Hannity vs OWS Mouthpiece.

Hannity vs OWS Mouthpiece.

By |

First off let me say I’m not a big fan of Sean Hannity. I don’t hate the guy, I don’t love the guy. I watch his show sometimes. My problem with Sean Hannity goes to the credibility issue. He carried the water for GWB even when GWB was dead wrong. That to me places a lot of his topics in the “Republican” at all cost realm which pisses me off.

That being said. He absolutely pummeled this OWS guy. A 29 yr old out of work Occupy Wall Street guy meets DAD.

Please watch this and listen to his answers. The questions for all intensive purposes were about a 5th grade level. Hannity didn’t ask tough questions.

The bottom line I hope folks hear is what the OWS’r said. “My funding is running out” Meaning he needs someone else to pay for his life. He wants everything for free. He’s a sponge, a leech and a piss poor spokesman for the OWS crowd but I bet he’s the best they got.

I also loved the “NYPD Put Rapists in Zuccati Park” line. That’s hilarious,

5 Replies to “Hannity vs OWS Mouthpiece.”

  2. LOVE IT! Shows just how ignorent these people are. Three words: GET A JOB! I’m retired military, have a full time job, plus two part time jobs. Could not have that if I spent my time taking free money from the working class and protesting against them. GET A JOB!

  3. “Duh, I don’t know where the money came from.” Stupid, I came from the unions via the slush fund known as “Bail Out” money.

  4. First, as for Hannity asking childish questions, the OWS moron clearly intended to dominate the direction of the discussion but Hannity, rightly, wouldn’t allow it. But the OWS guy was such an idiot that he had to be handled as Hannity did.

    Second, (sorry, this is admittedly nit-picking), it’s not “for all INTENSIVE purposes.” It’s “for all INTENTS and purposes.” In fact, if you just think about it, “intensive” makes absolutely no sense at all how you used it.

Comments are closed.