Candidate Qualifications… Anti-Obama, Pro American.

Candidate Qualifications… Anti-Obama, Pro American.

Kind of a redundant title.

IF you are Anti-Obama you are PRO-America. By Obama’s administrations actions they have proved to be MORE Against America than Iran, NK, and Venezuela combined. So if you are against Obama’s policies and actions, you are an American. STAND UP.

I think the experiment we conducted in 08 proves that a president needs to have ran something prior to running the most powerful and most influential nation the world has ever seen. The evidence is all there to see. Remove the spin, check the facts and see for yourself. All the “Blame” has been removed from the prior administration. Obama OWNS everything after the first year. PERIOD.

And how you doin?

So this particular election will be the most vile election ever in American history, we need to set some standards. We need to realize that running a state should be a prerequisite to attaining the white house as a residence. We need to elect people based on their record not on their speeches.

So in that light we need to inspect the GOP candidates for their potential. We failed miserably in 08 by electing a man that never ran anything. Obama was a senator that voted PRESENT on major issues or didn’t vote at all. He voted party line when it was for his voting base’s ideology and he has been the worst president EVER.

Romney ran Mass. (His record of Romney care, and several social issues dooms this man in my book)

Tim Pawlenty ran Min. (Very good record, also a pretty strong conservative)

Rick Santorum was a senator (Conservative candidate but never actually ran anything. He didn’t vote present on tough issues so that’s a plus)

Michelle Bachmann House Rep. (Conservative, thorn in the side of liberals/progressives and votes in accordance with the tea party mostly, A better than Obama choice but never ran anything)

Newt Gingrich. former speaker of the house (RINO, never ran anything other than the house. Never had to make tough decisions at state level. Better than Obama but that’s it)

Ron Paul- House rep for over 20 years (Far right conservative, mostly a good mouthpiece for soundbites, never ran anything has only been a critic. His criticism is tempered by ear marks. After criticizing them inserts his own when the bill is expected to pass. Better than Obama)

Herman Cain. (Never ran anything other than a business. He has made decisions in the business environment but nothing at state level. He’s a good sound bite and he makes sense but no record to inspect at government. Better than Obama)

Rick Perry. Governor of Texas (Runs a state, has a great economic story, suffers a little “RINO” record but nothing that can’t be over looked in the big picture. He’d be my favorite if he entered the race. WAY better than Obama and could actually be one of the best Presidents ever. In the image of Reagan for us on the right.)

Allen West. (Never ran anything, except men in military. That’s a bit different than government, the punishment for disagreement of his underlings is severe. In DC there is a lot of disagreements that must be handled differently than in combat. I truly like this man and I would vote for him if he entered the race. He would be my first choice because I know he could win and I know he’d remove the Obama stains from this nation faster than anyone else mentioned. But again I only base that on his speeches. No record to base it on. Better than Obama by far)

Chris Christie. Gov NJ (Hell Yes. if he entered the race he automatically becomes the front runner bar none. I don’t expect him to enter, but his record speaks volumes to the nation. Way better than Obama)

Sarah Palin. Ran AK (She did an outstanding job for Alaska until she quit. The reasons she walked away from Alaska have been debated for ever and will continue. She’s a strong conservative voice, she unhinges the left, she’s a great American cheerleader. Better than Obama)

So in the scheme of “Where’s the record” we have Five candidates that have actual experience in government. The minor league for the White House is STATE Governors. That’s where we need to start the cutting process. All the speeches, all the soundbites are great but where’s the record? We elected Obama on speeches and soundbites, that didn’t work out so well.

Oh and just so you know color or sex doesn’t matter. It’s ideology and record that should be the deciding factor.

It’s time to fire Obama, but lets not replace him with another moron. I’m sure we will here this line from the left:

You guys want to fire him because he’s black“…

Um No, evidently we hired him because he was black, we are firing him because he’s worthless.

 

3 Replies to “Candidate Qualifications… Anti-Obama, Pro American.”

  1. RE: Allen West. Once you start getting up in rank, you really have to start getting that political stuff under your belt- look at Colin Powell.
    I’d vote for him but we need him fighting for us in the House.
    As far as Herman Cain- part of the reason we’re in the mess we’re in is because of career politicians. Who was the last president that didn’t spend most of his life in politics? Reagan- maybe, Truman?

    1. Kurt, Remember Reagan was Governor of Cali first. There’s something to be said for a record running a state. Obama didn’t. Obama never ran anything. Obama was an absent senator just like he’s absent as POTUS. A Governor must make tough decisions and if he’s good at the state level, he/she will have a leg up. IMO.

      Cain? Yeah well, a pizza business gives you an idea of how business works. It helps you in the economic arena but the POTUS job calls for a lot more multi-tasking. We are seeing it done wrong. There are a few folks in the race that I’d vote for without holding my nose. Cain is one. Bachmann is another and Tim Pawlenty would get some support too. Santorum yeah maybe him too. Paul? Not likely however; he’s been nailing the talking points pretty good lately. IF he could just remove his head from his butt over the foreign policy/anti-Israel/Legalize drugs/ things…

Comments are closed.