Elections have CONSEQUENCES. Justice Breyer…

Elections have CONSEQUENCES. Justice Breyer…

When we decide to change the way things are going in DC we need to remember that elections have huge consequences in the long run. While I am not denying that McCain would have been a TERRIBLE choice for POTUS, I do know that the appointments he made to SCOTUS would be better than Sotomayor or Kagen…

Breyer: Founding Fathers Would Have Allowed Restrictions on Guns

If you look at the values and the historical record, you will see that the Founding Fathers never intended guns to go unregulated, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer contended Sunday.

Appearing on “Fox News Sunday,” Breyer said history stands with the dissenters in the court’s decision to overturn a Washington, D.C., handgun ban in the 2008 case “D.C. v. Heller.”

Breyer wrote the dissent and was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. He said historians would side with him in the case because they have concluded that Founding Father James Madison was more worried that the Constitution may not be ratified than he was about granting individuals the right to bear arms.

So when the next SCOTUS Appointment comes up and it’s a swing justice do you believe the judges will be pro 2nd amendment? The UN is already trying to remove our rights, Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama and the entire progressive side of the Democrat party want us disarmed. The only thing between those visions and our nation being disarmed is the SCOTUS.

IF we don’t have a conservative POTUS, we are at the mercy of the courts. So in the elections I beg you to consider the long term damage a progressive POTUS does. I beg you to consider the long term actions of short term leaders.

There has not been an uprising in the USA for a very long time, if they succeed in taking our arms, the will of the people will be silenced and we will become sheep. Then it’s too late for “Maybe we shouldn’t have done that”

This justice Breyer is ignorant of the facts. He is a liberal and he uses the constitution when it suits his argument. He discards it when his ideology is counter to it.

Comments are closed.